Low-Tech
In a culture where high-tech is synonymous with high-class, simple technology can seem irrelevant and outdated. After all, the low-tech lifestyle of horse-drawn carriages, weaving looms, and windmills hearkens back to an era predating our grandparents. Who wants to carry the stigma of appearing old-fashioned? Yet that desire to be modern — through new cars, computers, and televisions — has led to many social ills such as climate change, e-waste, and the obesity epidemic. Perhaps it’s high time to rethink high-tech.
The trouble with high-tech is that it prefers complicated solutions to simple ones. Take the problem of navigation, for example. Where a simple map and compass would do, high-tech prefers a GPS device instead. With the low-tech solution, all that’s needed is a piece of paper and a magnetized piece of iron. The high-tech device, however, requires batteries for power, integrated circuits for the computer, light-emitting diodes for the display, and hundreds of geosynchronous satellites for geolocation signals. Such sophistication, indeed, might come in handy for a truck driver or a mail carrier. But for the average commuter, the selling point of a GPS device is usually some minor convenience like voice navigation. How trivial, given high-tech’s record of wanton environmental destruction.
That pattern of environmental destruction is no accident. With high-tech products, wastefulness is built into the very design of its life-cycle. When a device requires electronics to manufacture, it is nearly impossible for an ordinary person to build it using scrap material. Any boy scout can print out a map using scratch paper and magnetize a compass made of scrap iron. Assembling your own TomTom — using only repurposed electronics, no less — is a superhuman feat (1).
So high-tech devices must always come from stores, which have little incentive to recycle. Repairs, when offered at all, are rare and expensive. That does not trouble shoppers as much as it should, since they have grown accustomed to devices that are not built to last. But will they ever grow accustomed to e-waste and landfills?
A pitiful trend emerges. Rather than empowering a person to solve his own problem, high-tech makes him dependent on outside infrastructure. A traveler must now rely on semiconductor factories, satellite networks, and coal power plants to figure out where he is. This forms the beginning of a vicious cycle: the more he uses his GPS, the quicker he forgets traditional navigation skills. Map illiteracy rates will rise, making GPS devices appear all the more essential. It is a likely situation, considering that only two centuries ago, our ancestors could navigate using stars alone.
Depending on a Rube-Goldberg machine is not cheap. Embedded in the price tag of every GPS device is the price of its specialized components: the processor, the LED display, the memory chips, the lithium-ion battery, the antenna, and the plastic surrounding the electronics. But the heaviest costs aren’t reflected in the price at all: they are passed on to future generations. Recycling e-waste is expensive, and no one wants to pay for the cleanup of space debris left by decomissioned satellites (2).
Alas, money can’t buy everything, especially not the infrastructure that high-tech demands. This is especially true in the backcountry, but even in the city, infrastructure can fail during an emergency. Satellite signals can grow weak, batteries can die, electronics can short-circuit, data can be erased, and GPS stores can close. When the infrastructure that sustains high-tech shuts down, so do the inventions. Modern technologies are not as robust as their primitive counterparts, so they simply stop working — often when needed the most.
It makes sense, then, to search for better technology — technology that is not highly complicated but rather highly appropriate. The ideal technology will be small in scale, easy to build, simple to fix, straightforward to recycle, low in cost, and highly reliable. This quest for appropriate technology, it turns out, often leads us back to the technology of our ancestors.
Besides, there’s no shame in being old fashioned. Horse-drawn buggies might draw unwanted attention, but other simple inventions, such as bicycles, vegetable gardens, and solar cookers, can even be stylish. You just need the will to get started — and maybe a little courage to deal with those curious neighbors and their impolite stares.
- Gpskit.nl teaches you how to build your own GPS using common hardware. The problem is that it’s difficult to recycle electronics.
- All those satellites produce a lot of space debris. Who will clean up all that floating garbage?
- Low-Tech Magazine has some great articles on low-tech inventions.
- Photo credit: Calsidyrose, CC BY.




“Rather than empowering a person to solve his own problem, high-tech makes him dependent on outside infrastructure.” This is so true, and it amazes me that it even has to be said. But I guess my dad was right: the more machines a person depends on, the less common sense he has. We lose a lot of skills through attrition — I think that makes us boring. I plan to keep on mending my clothes, handwriting notes, growing tomatoes, and reading maps!
thanks for another great read Aaron! At our house we experimented with going low-tech by having an electricity-free day each week (except for the fridge of course).
We made it Sundays because this is a no computer or tv day already. We use candles and lanterns once it gets dark. This is not only very relaxing but also fun for the kids. It also prevents me from turning on the washing machine etc…I need this complete break from constant work but probably wouldn’t manage to do it without deciding to be electricity-free.
Monday is no car day and again this is good for health and happiness because it forces me to be more organised and do all of the errands together on another day.
Have a wonderful day, Madeleine from Australia
An electricity free day – what an awesome idea!! I’m going to see how I can implement that into my family.
@All: It’s been a busy week! Sorry for the delays in writing: I’ve been doing a lot of programming, but hopefully I’ll have something new for y’all soon.
@Karen: Last year, while I was researching off-grid living, I realized that that I might have to live without a washing machine. But I had never hand-washed clothes before (no joke), so I had to look it up online. It’s amazing what society can forget over time, isn’t it?
@Madeleine: That’s great. Every little bit of electricity conservation helps, even if you’re not going 100% without it. Renewable energy is hard to come by: solar panels are expensive, and human-power can be exhausting. So if we ever plan to be sustainable, we’ll have to cut back on energy consumption. Keep it going and maybe add another day in the future!
I’ve recently discovered your site and love it. The rise and rise of the “sat-nav” here in the UK has left me astonished. We’re a very small country, with an extremely-dense population and you can barely glance in any direction without seeing a village, a town or a city. The roads are uniformly well-signposted and you can buy a road atlas of the entire UK for £1. Getting lost, pre-sat-navs, was not a problem which many of us encountered. Having your car broken-into to have your sat-nav stolen is now a common crime.
Sat-navs have caused horrendous problems with truckers, both UK-based firms and drivers coming over from the European continent. They get stuck down tiny country roads with mega-trucks, swamp themselves in fords and fall into water-courses. Vehicles appropriate to the autobahn or the freeway pound through the centres of ancient villages knocking corners off cottages and damaging coaching inns which predate Shakespeare. Bridges are damaged and residents of dozy little places are scrambling out of the way in fear of their lives. Sat-navs are no respectors of the fact that many places were named 1000+ years ago, names are shared with other settlements which can be anything from a dozen to several hundred miles away. Delivery drivers have gone 250 miles south-west when they were meant to go 100 miles north-east because they relied on sat-nav. No sense of the whereabouts of the sun in relation to compass directions in many of us modern humans.
These sat-nav things, and many similar technologies, are over-complicated and infantilising. The best knowledge is inside your own head, and practised with your own hands, where it can be shared with others. And yes, the $1 map or the £1 road atlas, is simple, appropriate, recylable and utterly delightful.