Tag Archives: habits

Our Future Water Crises

In the past few years, we’ve made great strides in energy-efficiency. With climate change entering the mainstream, people are starting to drive less, carpool more, and take out their old bicycles. It has helped us to save money, spur our economy, protect our forests, and reduce our dependence on oil.

Despite our progress in energy-efficiency, this is no time to rest on our laurels. It’s actually a cause for great concern. Subtly but surely, sustainable living is being reduced to nothing more than the single issue of reducing carbon emissions. Our society talks about carbon dioxide as if greenhouse gas management is all that there is to caring for the earth. Environmental protection, however, means so much more than not burning gasoline.

One vital issue that has been sorely neglected is water conservation. Very few people realize that water, much like gasoline, is a scarce resource that’s being depleted at unprecedented rates. In fact, water production may someday peak, just as oil will. As of today, the world has managed to increase water production to temporarily meet rising demands. In the future, however, water supply may hit an apex and then slowly decline. The world has already seen how declining oil reserves can hurt economies and increase political instability. But the situation will be far worse with water, since without this essential resource, drought and famine can devastate entire civilizations.

The situation already looks dire. In America, about one quarter of all irrigated land relies on the Ogalla aquifer. The precious groundwater from this aquifer is vital to agriculture in the Midwest: we use it to raise livestock and grow wheat, corn, and soybeans. In the last two decades, groundwater levels have declined at alarming rates, with the water table declining by over 30 feet in some areas. New wells must be drilled ever deeper to extract groundwater that is quickly running out.

Water shortage is a looming crisis for the rest of the world, too. Even though India is not a dry country, it struggles to supply enough water for drinking and agriculture for its population of over one billion. In more arid regions, prolonged drought can force communities to ration water. In the last few years, Australia has been forced to undergo strict water rationing to avoid permanently damaging the Murray-Darling basin. Farms in this region have been forced to shut down, and local communities have even been forced to limit showering in efforts to conserve water.

Global water crises are only getting worse. Consumer culture is putting an ever greater strain on the earth’s limited supply by increasing unnecessary industrial use of water. Global warming also threatens to change rainfall patterns, which will make the water situation more unstable. If climate change occurs, moist areas are likely to experience heavier rainfall, which will lead to flash floods. Dry areas, however, are prone to becoming even drier, which may lead to deserts.

As water supplies continue to shrink, less water will be available for agriculture. This food scarcity will result in a prolonged spike in food prices. This could be catastrophic for the poor, who spend much of their income on food alone. Climate change, combined with underground water depletion, could devastate our agriculture and harm our economy. Unfortunately, water shortage is an urgent environmental crisis that the public is failing to grasp.

To appreciate the importance of water, it helps to understand the water cycle. It all begins when the sun heats saltwater from the ocean. As water evaporates, it forms water vapor which can condense to form clouds. If these clouds move over land, water droplets can precipitate as rain, which can fall on vegetation or the bare ground. Rain that hits vegetation provides the water for photosynthesis, a biological reaction that helps plants grow. Water that hits bare ground can run-off the surface to pool in larger bodies of water, which helps forms streams and rivers.

Much of the water that falls on the ground surface will evaporate once again to reform water vapor. However, some of the rain water can also infiltrate into the soil, where it can collect as groundwater. In the diagram, the water table is the surface at which all sediment beneath it is completely filled with water. The height of the water table can increase or decrease, depending on factors like the rate of rainfall. Groundwater doesn’t always stay underground permanently. It can naturally resurface at lower elevations to form springs on the surface, or it can be extracted by man-made wells.

All of these processes — evaporation, condensation, precipitation, and infiltration — are occurring constantly to form the water cycle.

Although the earth has plenty of water, most of it is not fit to drink (the water is not potable). Most of the earth’s water is saltwater, which cannot be used unless it is desalinated by expensive, energy-intensive processes. Less than 3% of the earth’s remaining water is freshwater, but unfortunately, even these sources are often undrinkable. Most freshwater is frozen in glaciers; of the remaining freshwater, much of it has been tainted by pollution. In the past, rivers were often contaminated with biological pollution including human feces, which transmitted disease such as typhoid and cholera. Today, however, modern pollutants involve chemicals like mercury, lead, and pesticides. Pollution can make it difficult, if not impossible, to safely purify water for drinking.

There are many methods to collect water. One method is to catch rain as it falls. Using rain catchment systems (1), it’s possible to store rain for drinking during dry seasons. In the same fashion, farmland in moist areas might rely entirely on rain instead of using irrigation to grow their crops.

Besides rainfall, we also turn to rivers and springs for water. Unfortunately, a civilization’s demand for water usually exceeds what’s available on the surface. That’s because people are generally terrible at conservation. Besides satisfying our basic needs for food, drink, and hygiene, we like to indulge in water-intensive luxuries. Modern man enjoys living in deserts, wasting food, watering lawns, taking long baths, and owning private swimming pools. Given our insatiable appetite, surface water just won’t cut it.

To deal with this water shortage, we often build underground wells that tap into the ground water. There is about sixty times more groundwater than there is surface water, so in the short run, this vastly improves our supply. Our wells extract water from underground aquifers, which have collected infiltrated rainwater through the centuries. Because these wells pull from a large reservoir, they can supply far more water than is normally replenished through rainfall.

But cheap water is a mixed blessing. Whenever a scarce resource appears to be virtually unlimited, we tend to waste it with devastating consequences. In only a few years, it’s possible to squander groundwater that took centuries to deposit. Usually this groundwater is not allowed to replenish naturally, which results in shrinking reservoirs each year. This can result in the formation of deserts and massive water shortages in the future.

This environmental catastrophe can lead to human catastrophes like economic collapse and even water wars. What makes these crises so tragic is that they’re mostly preventable. Our planet has plenty of water for all if we chose to build a culture centered around sustainable development.

We must act conserve and we must start now. Time, along with our water supply, is quickly running out.


  1. Here’s a video of a simple, off-grid rainwater barrel that’s worth checking out. Collecting rainwater is a great idea, mostly because it helps the average homeowner to appreciate the scarcity of water.
  2. Photo credit in order: Schilling 2, CC BY-NC-ND. Kbh3rd, CC BY-SA.
    United States Geological Survey, public domain.
    US Geological Survey, slight modification to make words look clearer.
    National Department of Agriculture Rural Inforeach, PDF file.

Sustainable Means Cheap

A solar cooker is sustainable because it requires no electricity to run. You can build one for about a dollar.

Green living can never catch on if people can’t afford it. Sustainable living, then, isn’t just about taking care of the earth; it must also be sustainable financially. It would be great news, then, if living sustainably could save us money. What better incentive could there be to care for the earth?

Logically, it makes sense why green living ought to be cheap. Money is a store of value, and part of that value includes natural resources like water, wood, metal, and oil. The more money we spend on shopping, the more resources are used to produce our products. All other things being equal, conserving money should result in conserving our limited natural resources, which in turn lowers our environmental impact.

But by now, we’re all too familiar with sustainable products that cost double or triple of what their conventional counterparts cost. Our logical analysis doesn’t seem to match at all with reality. If money is truly linked to resource use, why is sustainable living so expensive?

The truth is that sustainable solutions truly are cheap — so cheap, in fact, that they’re often not worth selling. Real green solutions are often completely free of cost, requiring only a little cleverness and some elbow grease. But because a lifestyle can’t be sold as a physical, tangible product, businesses can’t make profits selling it. As a result, we don’t see green solutions sold on warehouse shelves like conventional products would be. So lifestyle solutions are rarely advertised, which mean that, tragically, they go totally unnoticed.

What gets advertised instead are the imitations. These greenwashed products are similar enough to their conventional counterparts, but tweaked slightly so that advertisers can call them sustainable. A greenwashed product will use a little recycled paper here, avoid a few chemicals there, but otherwise remains essentially the same. It still wastes energy, produces garbage, and destroys natural resources. Yet because these imitators don’t require any real lifestyle change, they are profitable enough to sell.

The prices in this table are ballpark estimates. Notice how the sustainable alternative is often practically free.
Conventional Greenwashed Sustainable
Conventional electricity ($0.15/kWh) Solar electricity ($0.35/kWh) No electricity (free)
Tissue paper ($1/box) Recycled tissue paper ($2/box) Reusable hand towels (free)
Toilet paper ($0.50/roll) Recycled toilet paper ($1/roll) Bidet water (free)
Bottled water (soda) ($1/bottle) Recycled plastic (aluminum) bottled water (soda) ($1/bottle) Water fountain (free)
Disposable diapers Biodegradable diapers Reusable, cloth diapers
Cotton t-shirt ($10) Organic cotton t-shirt ($20) Second-hand t-shirt ($5)
Stove Energy-efficient stove Solar cooker ($1.50 to build, free to operate)
New hardcover/paperback book ($20) Paperless e-reader ($200) / e-book download ($20) Library book (free)
New car ($15,000) New electric car ($40,000) Used bicycle ($150) / Bus passes ($600)

A serious flaw with greenwashed products is that they are expensive, often double or triple the price of their conventional counterparts. Consumers then find themselves facing a false dilemma: pay extra, or walk out the store feeling guilty.

Why do we keep falling for the same old deceptive marketing?

From a young age, we’ve been trained to think of ourselves as consumers. Out of instinct, we view everything in life as a commercial transaction. Eventually, we become dependent on shopping to solve all of life’s problems. If it’s not shrink-wrapped in plastic and sold in a big box chain store, we don’t even consider it.

  • If I want to work-out, I’ll buy a new treadmill instead of jogging in the park.
  • If I want to read, I’ll buy a book instead of borrowing one from the library.
  • If I want some entertainment, I’ll buy a new game console and some DVDs instead of playing sports.
  • If I’m thirsty, I’ll buy soda from a vending machine instead of using a water fountain.
  • If I need to sneeze, I’ll buy tissue paper instead of reusing a cloth handkerchief.

Our gut reaction is to throw money at every problem in life. So it’s no surprise that we approach the issue of green living with the exact same consumer mentality: buy a solution from the store. We want to be able to walk into the mall, waste our money, and walk out with a shiny new trinket in a bubble-wrapped, styrofoam-packed, cardboard box. It’s reaffirming to our Western way-of-life.

The consumer lifestyle will never be cheap, nor can it ever be truly sustainable. To be truly green, we have to step outside of consumer culture. Instead of purchasing new, we should be reusing and improvising. When we shop less, we spend less money and waste fewer resources. Not only will this lifestyle be gentler on the planet, it will be gentler on the wallet. It’s sustainable in every sense of the word.


  1. Photo by EBKauai, CC BY.

Energy-Efficiency Is Not Enough

The IT industry now wastes as much energy as the airline industry (1). This is an enormous environmental problem because most of the electricity in America is generated from coal power plants. Not only is coal a non-renewable resource, but it’s a far dirtier polluter than gasoline. As a result, the electronics industry has made an attempt to produce energy-efficient devices. Logically, we would therefore expect our total energy consumption to decrease. Yet the exact opposite is occurring. In fact, given its current rate of growth, IT might even become one of the top energy hogs of the 21st century.

How do we make sense of this energy paradox? Here’s one possible explanation: As devices become more energy-efficient, we start using them more often. Any potential savings that technology would have enabled, we throw away by increasing our consumption.

Energy is a product of power usage and operating time (Energy = Power × Time). To make this equation easier to grasp, think of electricity usage like running water from a faucet. Power corresponds to the flow of water, and energy corresponds to the volume of water. There are two ways to conserve water (energy): we can slow down flow (the power), or we can limit how long the faucet is open (operating time). Likewise, energy (water volume) is a product of power (flow rate) and time. If we want to conserve energy, we must decrease either power usage or time.

At first glance, our power usage appears to be decreasing. Back in the early 2000s, a desktop computer with a CRT monitor drew around 350W in power. Today, the average desktop and LCD monitor requires only 150W, 60% less power than its predecessor. By itself, this would represent a huge savings in energy. But the problem is that while each individual device uses less power, we now own far more devices than ever before.

It’s not unusual today for the average household to own dozens of computers. Long-gone is the era of the family computer; everyone now owns his own personal desktop and laptop. The average household is also flooded with non-traditional computers: tablets, smartphones, video game consoles, digital video recorders, mp3 players, GPS devices, and routers. Some computers are embedded in everyday items, hidden inside cars, microwaves, refrigerators, toaster ovens, and even clothing. Each computer also comes with a set of digital peripherals: external hard drives, speakers, LCD projectors, webcams, and printers. When the power ratings on all these devices are summed up, it turns out that total power usage per person hasn’t dropped much in the last decade. It might even have increased.

A similar effect is also negating the benefits of power management. To conserve energy, many of our digital appliances now enter sleep mode automatically when idle. This reduces the amount of time a device operates. But in spite of power management, we’re still powering our computers for longer than ever. It’s common to use a computer for 10+ hours each day, every day of the year. Perhaps equally important, a greater percentage of the world is starting to embrace digital appliances. Developing nations, especially India and China, are acquiring computers in large number and plugging into the hydrocarbon-powered electrical grid.

This paradox exposes why typical solutions to environmental problems often fail. Relying entirely on technology to solve cultural issues is counter-productive. The core problem isn’t a lack of energy-efficiency; it’s a lack of conservation ethic. Better technology — telecommuting, search engines, videoconferencing, and digital downloads — can be totally undermined by bad habits. Energy-efficiency only works when we don’t increase our consumption to match.

  1. The computer industry produces is responsible for 2% of the world’s carbon emissions, which is the same as the airline industry. So approximately, they use the same amount of energy. See COSN.
  2. A related phenomenon is known as the Jevons Paradox. William Jevons lived during the Industrial Revolution, a time when steam engines had just become practical. These steam engines wasted massive amounts of coal, so engineers were working to improve their efficiency. But Jevons predicted that any increases in efficiency would only result in more coal use, not less. This is because more efficient devices become more affordable to operate, and hence improved steam engines would be operated by more factories for longer periods of time. Hence, improved technology by itself can’t solve any energy problems.